One laptop, one install, and I would rather not add a third-party apt source to a machine that our security policy says should have as few as possible. Is the standalone package a supported path or just a by-product?
Can I just install the .deb without adding the apt repository?
Example threads. These questions and answers were written by the SDODS team to document real problems and how to fix them. The people named are illustrative, not real users. Questions asked on this site are marked new.
1 answer
Accepted answer
Supported, and it is the documented choice for exactly your case — the app without the update channel. Download the
.debfrom the download page first, then:bashsudo apt install ./SDODS-*-linux-amd64.debTwo details that matter. The leading
./is required: without it apt looks for a package by that name in your configured sources and tells you it does not exist. And use the glob rather than typing the version — the filename carries it, so a pasted command goes stale the moment there is a new release.The trade-off is the obvious one:
apt upgradewill never move it. You reinstall by hand when you want a newer build, which for one laptop is a fine deal.answered by Lars Vinter
Know the answer?
Wrap commands and output in triple backticks and they will render as a code block.
Checking whether you’re signed in…
Have a different question? Ask it.
Related
- Installing onto a machine with no outbound internet at all0 answers
- Unsupported architecture: i686 — is 32-bit Linux out entirely?0 answers
- NO_PUBKEY on apt update even though I installed the SDODS key3 answers
- apt update: the repository "does not have a Release file"4 answers
- Windows protected your PC — how do I get past SmartScreen on the installer?3 answers